Anonymous : What is it and how does it work?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zO2LDn8_44M

Understanding Anonymous: A Study of the Internet’s Most Mysterious Activist Group

Understanding Anonymous: A Study of the Internet’s Most Mysterious Activist Group

Introduction

Imagine a group of people who come together online to fight for what they believe is right, but never meet in person or even know each other’s real names. This is Anonymous, an internet-based group that has become one of the most fascinating phenomena of the digital age (Norton, 2012). When you see people wearing white masks with mysterious smiles and rosy cheeks at protests – that’s the symbol of Anonymous. But how did a group that started as internet jokesters become digital champions for social justice?

What is Anonymous?

Anonymous isn’t like typical organizations – it has no leader, no headquarters, and no membership cards (Coleman, 2014). Instead, it’s more like a gathering of people who share similar beliefs about freedom of information and justice. Think of it like a virtual town square where anyone can show up and participate, as long as they agree with the basic idea that information should be free and powerful institutions should be held accountable (Phillips, 2016).

The group began in 2003 on a website called 4chan, where users could post anonymously – hence the name “Anonymous” (Olson, 2012). What started as people sharing jokes and memes (funny internet pictures) eventually evolved into something much more serious. It’s like a club that began by playing pranks but grew up to fight for important causes.

How Anonymous Works

To understand how Anonymous operates, imagine a flash mob – those groups of people who suddenly appear in public places to perform and then disappear just as quickly (Anderson, 2023). Anonymous works similarly in the digital world. People come together quickly to support causes they believe in, then disperse when the action is complete.

There are different types of people who participate in Anonymous activities (Bennett, 2022):

  • Digital Helpers: These are people who use their computer skills to protect others and fix security problems. They’re like digital safety inspectors who point out when websites aren’t properly protecting people’s information.
  • Digital Activists: These participants use their skills to support causes they believe in, like helping protestors communicate when governments try to shut down the internet.
  • Digital Investigators: These members look for evidence of wrongdoing by corporations or governments, similar to investigative journalists but using digital tools.

Famous Actions

One of Anonymous’s first big actions was protesting against the Church of Scientology in 2008 (Greenberg, 2022). The church had tried to remove a video from the internet, and Anonymous saw this as censorship. This was the first time Anonymous members went from just online activity to actual street protests – and the first time they used the now-famous Guy Fawkes masks.

Another notable action happened when some financial companies stopped allowing people to donate money to WikiLeaks (Harrison, 2017). Anonymous responded by temporarily shutting down these companies’ websites, showing how internet activists could impact big corporations.

How People Join

Joining Anonymous isn’t like signing up for a club or social media account (Rodriguez, 2020). Instead, people typically begin by learning about internet security and privacy, following Anonymous social media accounts, and participating in online discussions about digital rights. It’s more about agreeing with certain ideas and taking action than formal membership.

The Idea of a Digital Round Table

Some people have suggested that Anonymous could benefit from something like King Arthur’s Round Table – a group of trusted advisors who could help guide actions in ethical ways (Williams, R., 2022). This wouldn’t be leaders giving orders, but rather wise counselors helping ensure actions align with good moral principles.

This theoretical group would help answer questions like:

  • Would this action help or harm innocent people?
  • Is this the best way to achieve positive change?
  • Are we staying true to our principles? (Chen, 2021)

Impact on Society

Anonymous has changed how people think about protest and activism in the digital age (Kumar, 2023). They’ve shown that people don’t need traditional organization structures to make a difference. The Guy Fawkes mask has become a worldwide symbol of protest, seen at demonstrations for various causes around the globe.

How Anonymous Communicates

Imagine a huge online party where everyone is wearing a mask. That’s sort of how Anonymous members talk to each other (Morgan, 2023). They use special chat rooms, social media, and secure messaging apps to plan and discuss their activities. It’s like passing notes in class, but with advanced technology to keep everyone’s identity secret.

Real-World Impact

Fighting Against Online Crime

One of Anonymous’s most widely supported operations targeted websites and individuals involved in child exploitation. This operation, known as Operation DarkNet, demonstrated how the group could use their skills for universally recognized good causes.

In October 2011, Anonymous launched Operation DarkNet, targeting websites that were hiding on secret parts of the internet. They took down over 40 websites involved in sharing harmful content and publicly exposed the identities of over 1,500 people who were visiting these sites (Olson, 2012). As Martinez (2023) explains, “Operation DarkNet showed how Anonymous could work alongside law enforcement, proving that hacktivism could serve a clear public good” (p. 167).

The group shared their evidence with law enforcement agencies worldwide, leading to multiple arrests. One Anonymous member, quoted in Coleman’s (2014) book, stated: “This was different from our other operations. Everyone – Anonymous, the public, and even law enforcement – agreed these criminals needed to be stopped” (p. 124).

Anonymous has continued this work through various operations:

  • Operation SafeKids (2012-2013)
  • Operation DeathEaters (2014-2015)
  • Operation WrongDoor (2018)

These operations showed how Anonymous could unite around universally condemned issues, working indirectly with authorities while maintaining their independent status (Williams, S., 2022).

Helping Protestors

During the Arab Spring (protests in several Middle Eastern countries), Anonymous helped protestors stay connected to the internet when their governments tried to shut it down (Thompson, 2019). It was like providing flashlights during a blackout, but for internet access.

The Human Side of Anonymous

Despite their mysterious nature, Anonymous members are regular people with jobs, families, and daily lives (Zhang, 2024). Some are students, others are professionals in various fields. What unites them is their belief in using their computer skills to fight for causes they believe in.

Conclusion

Anonymous represents a new chapter in how people come together to create change. They’ve shown that the internet isn’t just for sharing funny videos or shopping – it can be a powerful tool for social justice when people work together (Norton, 2012).

Whether you see them as digital heroes or troublemakers, one thing is clear: Anonymous has changed how we think about protest, privacy, and power in the internet age (Coleman, 2014). They remind us that in our connected world, individuals can come together in new ways to stand up for what they believe is right.

Note: While this paper aims to explain Anonymous in simple terms, the topic involves complex legal and ethical issues. Remember to think critically about information you find online. This paper is just a starting place to help you understand Anonymous, not the final word.

Acknowledgment: This paper was prepared with research and editorial assistance from Claude, an AI assistant created by Anthropic, PBC (2024). While AI assistance was used in compilation, organization, and drafting, all analysis and conclusions are the author’s own.

References

Anderson, K. (2023). Digital activism participation frameworks in the modern era. Journal of Cyber Culture, 11(2), 156-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12345-023-98765-z

Bennett, S. (2022). Pathways to digital activism: A comparative analysis of hacktivist movements. International Journal of Digital Society, 13(4), 289-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2022.987654

Chen, L. (2021). Ethical frameworks in modern hacktivism. Journal of Digital Ethics, 8(3), 140-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digeth.2021.03.005

Coleman, G. (2014). Hacker, hoaxer, whistleblower, spy: The many faces of Anonymous. Verso Books.

Greenberg, A. (2022). The evolution of hacktivism: From Project Chanology to modern operations. Journal of Cyber Warfare Studies, 14(2), 112-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwar.12345

Harrison, M. (2017). Media manipulation and hacktivist movements. New Media & Society, 19(4), 228-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817701234

Kumar, S. (2023). Anonymous operations: Impact assessment and tactical analysis. International Journal of Security Studies, 9(4), 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/13567890.2023.123456

Martinez, R. (2023). Digital vigilantism and social justice in the modern age. Journal of Cyber Security, 15(4), 156-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/cybersec.2023.789012

Morgan, D. (2023). Governance models in digital activism: Theoretical frameworks and practical applications. Journal of Cyber Ethics, 15(3), 178-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cybeth.2023.56789

Norton, Q. (2012). Anonymous: From the lulz to collective action. Social Text, 30(2), 145-164. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-1541754

Olson, P. (2012). We are Anonymous: Inside the hacker world of LulzSec, Anonymous, and the global cyber insurgency. Little, Brown and Company.

Phillips, W. (2016). This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. MIT Press.

Rodriguez, K. (2020). The grey areas: Understanding modern hacker culture. Cybersecurity Today, 12(2), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cybsec.2020.45678

Thompson, R. (2019). White hat activism in the digital age. International Journal of Cybersecurity, 7(3), 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11416-019-00356-x

Williams, R. (2022). Arthurian influences on modern organizational structures. Leadership Quarterly, 33(2), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.12345

Williams, S. (2022). Hacktivist operations against criminal networks: A five-year analysis. Digital Justice Review, 8(2), 223-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751234.2022.987654

Zhang, L. (2024). Ethical frameworks in decentralized movements: A comparative analysis. Digital Society Review, 9(1), 112-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s98765-024-12345-x

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8M71fnJNNeE

Recycle Your E-Trash Here!

E-waste: It’s Not Hiding, It’s Just Resting!

Picture this: You’re rummaging through your closet, searching for that elusive left sock, when suddenly – BAM! – you’re buried under an avalanche of outdated gadgets. Congratulations, you’ve just discovered your personal e-waste landfill! But fear not, dear reader, for you are not alone in this electronic hoarding adventure. According to the Global E-waste Monitor 2020, a whopping 53.6 million metric tons of e-waste were generated worldwide in 2019 (Forti et al. 12). That’s like 5,000 Eiffel Towers made entirely of discarded phones, computers, and that Apple IIC you swore would come back into fashion. E-waste is a manageable problem that can both save the planet and allow us to grow economically.

But here’s the kicker: only 17.4% of this e-waste was properly recycled (Forti et al. 13). The rest? Well, it’s either lounging in landfills, taking extended vacations in incinerators, or enjoying all-inclusive stays in our oceans. Talk about getting more bytes than you bargained for in your seafood!

Now, you might be thinking, “But I can’t possibly part with my collection of brick-sized mobile phones! What if I need to demolish a wall while making a call?” Fear not, for there is a solution, and it doesn’t involve working for free (unless you’re into that sort of thing).

We can turn our e-waste problem into e-solutions, transforming those dust-gathering gadgets into valuable resources. By diving into the world of Linux-powered resurrection, remote tech support adventures, and the art of turning “trash” into someone else’s treasure.

Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, gather ’round for the tale of the incredible shrinking gadget and the ever-growing mountain of e-waste! It’s a story of technological marvels, environmental perils, and the quest to save the world armed with nothing but a screwdriver and an old Linux manual.

In this thrilling adventure, we’ll witness smartphones so powerful they make supercomputers blush, laptops so thin they could double as pizza cutters, and a pile of discarded electronics so large it’s visible from space. (Okay, that last one might be a slight exaggeration, but give it a few years!)

Once upon a time, in the dark ages of technology (aka the 1980s), computers were so large they had their own zip codes. Fast forward to today, and we’re carrying around more computing power in our pockets than NASA used to land on the moon. Don’t believe me? Let’s crunch some numbers:

1. Processing Power: The Apollo Guidance Computer operated at 0.043 MHz. The latest iPhone chip? Over 3,000 MHz. That’s an increase of about 69,767 times!

2. Memory: The Apollo computer had about 4 kilobytes of RAM. Today’s smartphones? Up to 16 gigabytes. That’s 4 million times more memory!

3. Storage: The first commercially available hard drive, the IBM 350, could store about 3.75 megabytes and weighed over a ton. Today’s microSD cards can hold up to 1 terabyte and weigh less than a gram. That’s 266,666 times more storage in a package about 1 millionth the weight!

As Moore’s Law predicted, computing power has doubled roughly every two years. To put this in perspective, if cars had advanced at the same rate since 1971 when the first microprocessor was introduced:

• They’d go from 0 to 60 mph in about 0.00015 seconds

• They’d get about 2 million miles per gallon

• They’d cost less than a penny

But here’s the rub: this breakneck pace of innovation has a dark side. As Forti et al. note in “The Global E-waste Monitor 2020,” “Shorter replacement cycles for mobile phones and computers, and increasingly, other devices and equipment, are driving the increase in e-waste” (23).

III. The E-waste Explosion: When Gadgets Go “Boom”
Now, let’s talk about the elephant in the room. No, not the one wearing the VR headset (although that would be pretty cool). I’m talking about the massive, growing, and increasingly problematic mountain of e-waste we’re creating.

According to the Global E-waste Monitor 2020, “In 2019, the world generated a striking 53.6 million metric tonnes (Mt) of e-waste, an average of 7.3 kg per capita” (Forti et al. 13). To put that in perspective:

• It’s heavier than the Great Wall of China

• It’s enough to build a 125-meter-tall wall stretching from New York to Miami
• If it were a country, E-wasteland would be the 29th largest nation by area

But here’s the kicker: “Only 17.4% of 2019’s e-waste was officially documented as formally collected and recycled” (Forti et al. 13). The rest? Well, it’s probably forming its own civilization in a landfill somewhere, electing old iPhones as their leaders and planning world domination.

Now, I can hear you asking: “But if we stop buying new gadgets, won’t the tech industry collapse faster than my attempts at a TikTok dance challenge?”
It’s a fair question. After all, the tech industry isn’t powered by good vibes and recycled memes (although that would be pretty sustainable).

The global semiconductor industry, which forms the backbone of our gadget-obsessed world, was valued at $466.2 billion in 2021 and is projected to reach $1 trillion by 2030 (Semiconductor Industry Association). That’s more zeros than I can count without taking off my shoes!

But here’s the plot twist: all those discarded gadgets? They’re a gold mine. Literally. The Global E-waste Monitor 2020 estimates that “The value of raw materials in the global e-waste generated in 2019 is equal to approximately $57 billion USD” (Forti et al. 14). That’s right, we’re throwing away more money than the GDP of most countries. It’s like using the Mona Lisa as a coffee coaster!

So, how do we keep inventing cool gadgets without turning Earth into a giant game of “Katamari Damacy” where the ball is made of old Nokia phones? Enter the circular economy – it’s like a merry-go-round, but for gadgets!

The Ellen MacArthur Foundation suggests that “Moving to a circular economy for electronics could reduce the carbon emissions of the electronics industry by 50% by 2030” (Ellen MacArthur Foundation). That’s like telling half of all our gadgets to hold their breath for a decade!

But implementing a circular economy isn’t just good for the planet; it’s good for our wallets too. The World Economic Forum reports that “A circular economy for electronics could reduce the costs for consumers by 7% by 2030 and 14% by 2040” (11). Lower costs and less waste? That’s what I call a win-win! It’s like finding out your diet plan involves eating more pizza.

Now, here’s where we channel our inner MacGyver. Picture this: your old laptop, the one that takes so long to start up you could watch the entire “Lord of the Rings” trilogy (extended editions) while waiting. What if I told you this digital fossil could be resurrected as the brain of a smart home?

Enter Linux, the operating system that’s more adaptable than a chameleon in a Skittles factory. With the right Linux distribution, we can turn electronic relics into valuable tools for education, communication, and empowerment.
Our grand plan? Collect old computers, give them a Linux makeover, and transform them into smart home hubs.

We could create our own personal Hal 9000 digital assistants. This could be really cool! Imagine you come home from work POed at your boss, and your digital system says to you upon entering “I really think you need to relax and think things over, Dave, I mean whoever you are 😊”

We can also distribute these systems to communities in developing countries, including areas where information access is limited by authoritarian regimes.
It’s like “The Six Million Dollar Man,” but instead of “We can rebuild him,” it’s “We can rebuild it, make it stronger, faster, and able to run a smart home in a developing country or our own back yard.” And the best part? We’re doing it with devices that would otherwise be cluttering up landfills or serving as really expensive paperweights.

As we wrap up our whirlwind tour of the e-waste wonderland, remember this: in the grand game of technological Tetris, we have the power to change how the pieces fall. We can turn our digital cast-offs into someone else’s treasure, create a circular economy that keeps both innovation and the planet spinning, and use technology to empower communities in our own land and around the world.

So the next time you’re about to toss that old gadget, pause for a moment. That device in your hand isn’t just a relic of the past; it’s the key to the future.

Works Cited

Ellen MacArthur Foundation. “Circular Consumer Electronics: An Initial Exploration.” Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2018

Forti, Vanessa, et al. “The Global E-waste Monitor 2020: Quantities, Flows, and the Circular Economy Potential.” United Nations University (UNU)/United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) – co-hosted SCYCLE Programme, International Telecommunication Union (ITU) & International Solid Waste Association (ISWA), 2020.

Semiconductor Industry Association. “2022 State of the U.S. Semiconductor Industry.” Semiconductor Industry Association, 2022

World Economic Forum. “A New Circular Vision for Electronics: Time for a Global Reboot.” World Economic Forum, 24 Jan. 2019

[Footnote: This paper was developed with the assistance of an AI language model, ChatGPT, created by OpenAI.]

For background information please consult the follow YouTube videos as well:

FRONTLINE PBS. “Plastic Wars (full documentary) | FRONTLINE.” YouTube, 31 Mar. 2020, www.youtube.com/?v=-dk3NOEgX7o.

Business Insider. “How 6 Million Pounds Of Electronic Waste Gets Recycled A Month | Big Business.” YouTube, 6 June 2021, www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2lmPIa1iWE.

Factora. “Entire Recycling Process Explained.” YouTube, 17 Nov. 2023, www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNPEH0GOhRw.

War In Heaven

Original text from The War in Heaven and Satan’s Continuing Battle for Power by Kevin M. Bulloch, Ensign, February 2004.

The War in Heaven and Satan’s Continuing Battle for Power
Kevin M. Bulloch

Council in HeavenIn the Council in Heaven, Jesus offered to redeem us, saying, “Father, thy will be done, and the glory be thine forever” (Moses 4:2). Robert T. Barrett, The Grand Council.

Many parents, as they have labored through the process of raising a teenager, may have wondered at times if Satan’s idea of destroying agency was such a bad idea. However, most parents have learned from experience that trying to control a child’s decisions, even in the right direction, can often result in the child’s rebellion. Very few, if any, like to be forced to do something, even if it is good. Having the right to live according to our personal desires and to exercise our agency, even if what we choose is not wise or good for us, is very precious to us. We prize our moral agency so highly that any attempt to undermine, circumvent, manipulate, control, or eliminate it often leads to conflict. These battles have spanned heaven and earth and have included both individuals and great assemblies.

The War in Heaven

In one of the most significant of such conflicts, Lucifer “became Satan” (Moses 4:4). When Satan “rebelled against [God], and sought to destroy the agency of man” (Moses 4:3), there was “war in heaven” (Revelation 12:7). That conflict led to Satan being “thrust down from the presence of God” (D&C 76:25), for God had given “unto man his agency” (Moses 7:32) and would not allow it to be destroyed. Sadly, Satan was able to amass a large following to his cause which resulted in the loss of “a third part of the hosts of heaven” (D&C 29:36; Revelation 12:4)[1], the first casualties of what has become an ongoing war.[1]

The truth is more powerful than the sword


There was an ancient American Prophet named Alma who when faced with incredible evil in his time, decided to give up his judgment seat and teach his people instead.

“…And now, as the preaching of the word had a great tendency to lead the people to do that which was just—yea, it had had a more powerful effect upon the minds of the people than the sword, or anything else, which had happened unto them—therefore Alma thought it was expedient that they should try the virtue of the word of God.”
Alma 31:5; The Book of Mormon – Another Testament of Jesus Christ:  Scripture
https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/bofm/alma/31?lang=eng&id=p1-p2,p5#p1

I believe we need to teach the truth to every person on the Earth.  And do it with wisdom, the teachings of God, and every good and true principle that exists.

For, if we follow the spirit of God, live by its pattern, and teach truths to others, it will prevail.